tracker issue : CF-3128906

select a category, or use search below
(searches all categories and all time range)
Title:

Raising again, events like post/preFlush are missing

| View in Tracker

Status/Resolution/Reason: Closed/Withdrawn/

Reporter/Name(from Bugbase): Andrew Scott / Andrew Scott (Andrew Scott)

Created: 03/02/2012

Components: ORM Support

Versions: 9.0.1

Failure Type: Usability Issue

Found In Build/Fixed In Build: 9.0.1 /

Priority/Frequency: Major / All users will encounter

Locale/System: English / Win 2008 Server x64

Vote Count: 0

Duplicate ID:	CF-3123428

Problem Description: I am raising this again and before its closed and deferred please fully read, and pass on to the ColdFusion product manager, I would like an explanation why this has been deferred and closed every time it is raised now spanning 2 major releases and 1 minor release.

http://www.andyscott.id.au/2012/3/2/Is-Adobe-switched-on-I-dont-believe-they-are-ColdFusion-10-should-be-marked-as-going-home

And yes I still have the tickets and conversations with Adobe going back to ColdFusion 9 alpha / beta, where it was claimed that this had been fixed. If it had been fixed as marked by you developers, I would not be hear 5 years later asking for it to still be fixed. We spend enough on the license of this product, without having to again spend money to get this sort of thing fixed urgently either.

Secondly as I have raised this as you can read, not once, but a number of times. I raised it in CF9 alpha, and CF9.01 beta and before CF10 had even begun being work on. Each and everytime it has been closed, and deferred.

This is a serious blocker to code that I have tried to write, and has no know work around. And for 5 years I have had to tell my clients I am still waiting for Adobe to fix this. No wonder people are moving away from ColdFusion, with these sort of attitudes from you developers. I have lost 3 clients on this matter in 5 years, and they are either now written in PHP, or grails.

How many more of these type of bugs will be deferred and for how long will you continue to ignore these type of requests for the language?


Steps to Reproduce:

Actual Result:

Expected Result:

Any Workarounds:

None, has been no workaround for 5 years.

----------------------------- Additional Watson Details -----------------------------

Watson Bug ID:	3128906

External Customer Info:
External Company:  
External Customer Name: ascott67
External Customer Email:  
External Test Config: My Hardware and Environment details:

Attachments:

Comments:

It is a valid enhancement but is too late to add to this release now. We will take it up if time permits otherwise we will consider it for the next. Deferring it for the time being.
Comment by Rupesh K.
20430 | March 06, 2012 08:00:39 AM GMT
So how do you ignore the fact that this has been asked for now 3 years plus, and should have been implemented years ago? Really all these defers, means we will never add it. So sick of raising it and then being told it is being defered, when I raised it when there was time for it to be added to the things to do. Seriously, there is no excuse for something like this.
Comment by External U.
20431 | March 06, 2012 10:52:06 AM GMT