Title:
Bug 85252:[ANeff] ER for: imageResize/imageScaleToFit "blurFactor" "0"Currently, omitting the 4th parameter to imageResize/imageScaleToFit, and passing 0 for 4th parameter, does not return same result
| View in TrackerStatus/Resolution/Reason: Closed/Fixed/
Reporter/Name(from Bugbase): Aaron Neff / Aaron Neff (Aaron Neff)
Created: 11/30/2010
Components: CFIMAGE
Versions: 9.0.1
Failure Type:
Found In Build/Fixed In Build: 0000 /
Priority/Frequency: Minor / Most users will encounter
Locale/System: English / Platforms All
Vote Count: 1
Problem:
[ANeff] ER for: imageResize/imageScaleToFit "blurFactor" "0"Currently, omitting the 4th parameter to imageResize/imageScaleToFit, and passing 0 for 4th parameter, does not return same result.Omitting the 4th parameter (blurFactor), indicates no blur.Thus, passing "0" for 4th parameter (blurFactor) should also indicate no blur.If one is using imageResize|ScaleToFit(myImage, myWidth, myHeight, myBlur), it is not possible to get the same result as imageResize|ScaleToFit(myImage, myWidth, myHeight), when myBlur=0.I don't really see a need to be throwing an error for "0". Can't blurFactor=0 simply mean same as not passing that 4th parameter at all?Of course, the workaround is to just use 3 parameters, if the 4th would be 0, but that shouldn't be necessary.
Method:
Result:
----------------------------- Additional Watson Details -----------------------------
Watson Bug ID: 3042899
External Customer Info:
External Company:
External Customer Name: Aaron Neff
External Customer Email: 3D1D17B03C844EBF992001AC
External Test Config: 11/30/2010Attachments:
Comments: