tracker issue : CF-4126478

select a category, or use search below
(searches all categories and all time range)
Title:

Page for selecting Dev/Prod/Secure profile should NOT remove IP option for Dev/Prod

| View in Tracker

Status/Resolution/Reason: Closed/Withdrawn/Duplicate

Reporter/Name(from Bugbase): Charlie Arehart / Charlie Arehart (Charlie Arehart)

Created: 03/09/2016

Components: Installation/Config

Versions: 2016

Failure Type: Unspecified

Found In Build/Fixed In Build: Beta2_v12 / NA

Priority/Frequency: Major / Unknown

Locale/System: English / Win All

Vote Count: 3

In the CF installer, on the "select coldfusion server profile" page, if one picks "Development" or "Production" profile, the installer removes the option to specify an "allowed ip address" for access to the Admin.

There's no reason that option should ONLY be selectable for the "Secure" profile. Anyone might want to take it.

And really, this isn't a new issue with Raijin. It's been an issue since CF10.

Indeed, if there may ever be work done on the CF11 installer, it would be great if this was fixed there, but I Realize there may never be another CF11 installer, let alone an update to it. :-)

Also, while the new Raijin behavior to lock the Admin down to 8500 might seem to negate the importance of this issue, but it does not. For one thing, one may STILL want to limit the IPs that could access the Admin, even within a firewall where 8500 was accessible.

----------------------------- Additional Watson Details -----------------------------

Watson Bug ID:	4126478

External Customer Info:
External Company: self-employed
External Customer Name: Charlie Arehart
External Customer Email: CHARLIE@CAREHART.ORG
External Test Config:

Attachments:

Comments:

Adding BUG AUDIT TRAIL ********action: updated fieldName: Priority newValue: 1 oldValue: 0 oprid: vmannebo recordName: RQ_DEFECT timpestamp: 2016-02-16 04:56:39.0 action: added fieldName: Vote Type newValue: BETA oldValue: Blank oprid: prerelease recordName: AD_DEFECT_VOTE timpestamp: 2016-01-14 17:42:15.0 action: updated fieldName: Owner newValue: djha oldValue: mukumar oprid: vmannebo recordName: RQ_DEFECT timpestamp: 2016-01-13 03:04:43.0 action: updated fieldName: Reason newValue: Blank oldValue: PRNeedInfo oprid: vmannebo recordName: RQ_DEFECT timpestamp: 2016-01-13 03:04:43.0 action: updated fieldName: Status newValue: ToFix oldValue: ToTrack oprid: vmannebo recordName: RQ_DEFECT timpestamp: 2016-01-13 03:04:43.0 action: updated fieldName: Reason newValue: PRNeedInfo oldValue: PRHaveInfo oprid: vmannebo recordName: RQ_DEFECT timpestamp: 2016-01-13 03:04:22.0 action: added fieldName: Vote Type newValue: BETA oldValue: Blank oprid: prerelease recordName: AD_DEFECT_VOTE timpestamp: 2016-01-12 18:26:29.0 action: updated fieldName: State newValue: Open oldValue: Open oprid: prerelease recordName: RQ_DEFECT timpestamp: 2016-01-12 17:02:59.0 action: updated fieldName: Status newValue: ToTrack oldValue: ToTrack oprid: prerelease recordName: RQ_DEFECT timpestamp: 2016-01-12 17:02:59.0 action: updated fieldName: Reason newValue: PRHaveInfo oldValue: PRNeedInfo oprid: prerelease recordName: RQ_DEFECT timpestamp: 2016-01-12 17:02:59.0 action: added fieldName: Vote Type newValue: BETA oldValue: Blank oprid: prerelease recordName: AD_DEFECT_VOTE timpestamp: 2016-01-12 01:58:05.0 action: updated fieldName: Reason newValue: PRNeedInfo oldValue: Blank oprid: mukumar recordName: RQ_DEFECT timpestamp: 2016-01-11 11:55:21.0 action: updated fieldName: Owner newValue: mukumar oldValue: djha oprid: mukumar recordName: RQ_DEFECT timpestamp: 2016-01-11 11:55:21.0 action: updated fieldName: Status newValue: ToTrack oldValue: ToFix oprid: mukumar recordName: RQ_DEFECT timpestamp: 2016-01-11 11:55:21.0 action: updated fieldName: Fix By Product Milestone newValue: Alpha oldValue: Blank oprid: mukumar recordName: RQ_DEFECT timpestamp: 2016-01-11 11:54:50.0 action: updated fieldName: Reason newValue: Blank oldValue: Blank oprid: mukumar recordName: RQ_DEFECT timpestamp: 2016-01-11 11:54:50.0 action: updated fieldName: Owner newValue: djha oldValue: mukumar oprid: mukumar recordName: RQ_DEFECT timpestamp: 2016-01-11 11:54:50.0 action: updated fieldName: Severity newValue: 0 oldValue: 2 oprid: mukumar recordName: RQ_DEFECT timpestamp: 2016-01-11 11:54:50.0 action: updated fieldName: Fix By Milestone newValue: Alpha oldValue: Blank oprid: mukumar recordName: RQ_DEFECT timpestamp: 2016-01-11 11:54:50.0 action: updated fieldName: Status newValue: ToFix oldValue: Unverified oprid: mukumar recordName: RQ_DEFECT timpestamp: 2016-01-11 11:54:50.0 action: updated fieldName: QE Assigned newValue: mukumar oldValue: pnayak oprid: vmannebo recordName: RQ_DEFECT timpestamp: 2016-01-11 05:14:30.0 action: updated fieldName: Owner newValue: mukumar oldValue: pnayak oprid: vmannebo recordName: RQ_DEFECT timpestamp: 2016-01-11 05:14:30.0
Comment by CFwatson U.
4012 | March 09, 2016 02:15:28 AM GMT
+1 I agree you should be able to specify restricted IPs for all types of install
Vote by External U.
4014 | March 09, 2016 02:15:29 AM GMT
This makes perfect sense and is something that should take a few minutes to tweak in the installer UI. Why this is being pushed off to the next release when we're not even in public beta yet is beyond me.
Vote by External U.
4015 | March 09, 2016 02:15:30 AM GMT
+1 - Even w/ Raijin on port 8500, this would help prevent access from other LAN IPs.
Vote by External U.
4016 | March 09, 2016 02:15:31 AM GMT
Added By:vmannebo Note Added: Not sure where the email came from (regarding QE team needing assistance". As far as this specific case is concerned, we will make the change in the next release. Date Added :2016-01-13 03:04:24.0 Added By: PreRelease User User Name:Charlie Arehart Note Added: OK (bummer to hear that, since we're just talking about the installer. Should be trivial to fix). Also, I had gotten an email from the system saying that "Our QE team needs your assistance to reproduce this bug on our end.", but when I came here I only see this note about it being "late in the cycle". Are you needing any more help to reproduce or understand the significance of the issue? Date Added :2016-01-12 17:02:58.0 Added By:mukumar Note Added: A little late in the cycle for us to make such changes. This is useful, so we will consider this for the next release. Date Added :2016-01-11 11:54:50.0 Added By: PreRelease User User Name:Charlie Arehart Note Added: Entered Bug. Date Added :2016-01-10 08:13:29.0
Comment by CFwatson U.
4013 | March 09, 2016 02:15:36 AM GMT
Closing this bug. Duplicate of #CF-4105601.
Comment by Mukesh K.
30644 | April 22, 2019 06:07:45 AM GMT