tracker issue : CF-3038626

select a category, or use search below
(searches all categories and all time range)
Title:

Bug 77330:WriteDump() should be just Dump() for consistency with the other tags and functions cfabort and abort, cftrace and trace, etc)

| View in Tracker

Status/Resolution/Reason: Closed/Withdrawn/NotABug

Reporter/Name(from Bugbase): MrSmith MrSmith / Mack (MrSmith MrSmith)

Created: 05/19/2009

Components: Debugging, CFDump

Versions: 9.0

Failure Type: Unspecified

Found In Build/Fixed In Build: 0000 /

Priority/Frequency: Normal / Unknown

Locale/System: English / Platforms All

Vote Count: 4

Problem:

WriteDump() should be just Dump() for consistency with the other tags and functions cfabort and abort, cftrace and trace, etc)
Method:


Result:

----------------------------- Additional Watson Details -----------------------------

Watson Bug ID:	3038626

External Customer Info:
External Company:  
External Customer Name: Mack
External Customer Email: 3CBD0ACC468BF68C992015C2
External Test Config: 05/19/2009

Attachments:

Comments:

+1 vote. There has been discussion about dump() possibly being an already-existing UDF for some people, but all it will be doing is to wrap up <cfdump> anyhow, which is a debugging tag for the most part, so it's really not going to be a hassle for people to refactor their code slightly. It's also a very SIMPLE refactor. I know that backwards-compat has some sort of grail-like status with the CF team - and this is usually good - but, face it, there are always backwards compat issues with each CF release anyhow, and this particular backwards compat issue would be one that would be almost universally applauded, I think. -- Adam
Vote by External U.
23694 | November 10, 2011 07:20:46 PM GMT
This bug has been voted..
Vote by External U.
23695 | November 10, 2011 07:20:47 PM GMT
This bug has been voted..
Vote by External U.
23696 | November 10, 2011 07:20:48 PM GMT
This bug has been voted..
Vote by External U.
23697 | November 10, 2011 07:20:49 PM GMT