search : legacy code

select a category, or use search below
(searches all categories and all time range)

displaying top 100 results

Easily Moving from Legacy Code Hell to Modern CFML Heaven
Comment on Clean up your legacy code with Codechecker by Stewart
Comment on Clean up your legacy code with Codechecker by Kishore Balakrishnan
Clean up your legacy code with Codechecker
2613636 CF-3197321 External U. This bug prevents us from moving legacy code from Coldfusion 9
Comment on Clean up your legacy code with Codechecker by Charlie Arehart
2610073 CF-3732993 External U. I definitely support this. It also gives a clean way to update some legacy code that may not have query parameters.
Comment on Clean up your legacy code with Codechecker by Charlie Arehart
Comment on Clean up your legacy code with Codechecker by murpg
2673429 CF-4126560 Legacy Area Travis Walters Code Analyzer Migration Tool Update 2 In the ColdFusion Administrator, I have not much experience using the "Code Analyzer" tool that has been there in previous releases and I have a few questions that might lead to some enhancements: Is there anyway
2673312 CF-4127481 External U. Our legacy code base contains countless examples of this type of function. Imagine the dynamic output is a list of classes on an HTML element. Without the space between class names css and js references no longer work. It would be impossible for us to refactor our
2608442 CF-4093045 External U. Thanks for the update. I my opinion changing it later would mean even a higher risk, since at that point there would be even more legacy code to change. Do you have any idea how much later, later is?
2612744 CF-3434473 External U. OK, what I think is clear here though is that whilst there might be an ER in here somewhere, the current implementation is not desirable? David, to be completely honest with you "but as a faster way to mitigate blocks of in legacy code" should not be the grounds
2673428 CF-4126561 Legacy Area Travis Walters Code Analyzer Migration Tool Update In the ColdFusion Administrator, I have not much experience using the "Code Analyzer" tool that has been there in previous releases and I have a few questions that might lead to some enhancements: It appears
. This would allow for the community to move away from legacy code that should not be used anymore, and although very idealistic, if everyone did it, Adobe could start cleaning up the language of code that should be moved away from.
2675973 CF-4010693 External U. We need better examples and references to things such as ways to convert legacy tag based code to cfscript based format
are affected and IE9 is the corporate browser. Due to legacy code, we are not using J2EE sessions on these servers. We are continuing to research, but any insight would be helpful.
this and it will run ok. Actual Result: Now use the Code Analyzer in Adobe ColdFusion 11 Administrator to analyze this file and it would report an error stating that the getmetadata function is new in ColdFuion10 and the UDF name must be changed to avoid conflict in our legacy code. Expected Result: No error must
2610311 CF-3712010 External U. Adobe: Preserving legacy bugs because you've had to code around these bugs for so long that if we fixed the bugs we'd break your code.
2602148 CF-3037176 External U. With every new release, Adobe adds more and more built-in functions that break lots of legacy code. Please remove this name conflict check because most method calls are made against an object (CFC) and are already disambiguated. The very fact that a simple
ColdFusion Webinars 2020 ColdFusion for the Next Decade — All about the Buzzworthy ColdFusion 2020 (Webinar by Adobe) Adobe ColdFusion Developer Week 2020. ColdFusion Webinars 2019 Continuous Security for your CFML code with Fixinator Webinar with Pete Freitag Clean up your legacy code […] The post
For* functions, but as a faster way to mitigate blocks of in legacy code.
AllenGP Identify Unlinked Pages – CF Builder We have a large number of legacy pages in our application’s code repository which are not linked to other pages. Is there a way in ColdFusion Builder to see which pages are not linked so they can be deleted? The post Identify Unlinked Pages – CF Builder
themselves really don't do much to help my argument. Microsoft does do an excellent job with the way they present their examples, so tab-based wouldn't be a bad approach. Regardless, the docs also need better examples and a good description of how to transition legacy tag-based code to script
an easy way to protect against XSS, especially in legacy code bases. ----------------------------- Additional Watson Details ----------------------------- Watson Bug ID: 3434473 External Customer Info: External Company: External Customer Name: David Epler External Customer Email:
2608368 CF-4110354 Language Luis Majano CFM templates do not parse == and/or != operators Problem Description: CFM templates do not parse == and/or != operators. This works on Lucee. Steps to Reproduce: {code:java} ` {code} Actual Result: Expected Result: Any Workarounds: Changing to legacy
notice that if I have declared a cfargument in my method, the AS object is passed as if it were a struct being passed in positionally which is breaking my legacy code. Should this be considered a bug, or was I simply being dependent on an unintended feature in CF 8? Method: Result
this was an issue in the esapi jar and is fixed in the most recent version esapi-2.2.0.0.jar I was working with legacy code and replaced all occurrences of HTMLEditFormat with EncodeForHTML and JSStringFormat with EncodeForJavaScript. This led to double encodings which I wanted to correct by setting the second
another site that still uses global settings in the CF administrator. That site, "Acelink", also uses Application.cfm since it was built many moons ago. It still runs on pre-CF8 legacy code. In the CF Admin, I have a custom tag path that points to the root of the acelink web site directory. Again
2613603 CF-3207170 External U. I will not be able to provide the source code where this is occurring. Even if we could it would be a bit difficult as we see this occur where there are a large number of files involved through several cfc function calls. One example is our legacy in-house built
2597108 CF-3114283 Legacy Area : CF Anywhere Travis Walters Bug 87281:-(Watson Migration Closure)CODE A: SELECT INSTITUTION_ID, INSTITUTION_NAME, INSTITUTION_CITY, COUNTRY_ID, INSTITUTION_DEGREES, INSTITUTION_START_DATE, INSTITUTION_END_DA Problem: CODE A: SELECT INSTITUTION_ID, INSTITUTION
2671773 CF-4198099 External U. Nimit please add enctype="multipart/form-data" to the form tag. I failed to include that in my code sample. In CF9 and CF 2016 Update 1 WITHOUT enctype: form fields disappear from form.fieldnames WITH enctype: form fields DO NOT disappear from form.fieldnames In CF
2609075 CF-3936559 Hot Fix Installer Miguel Arvelo CF10 Update 15 "broke" our server Problem Description :After applying CF10 manually to our CF10 enterprise the "Server Updates" page in the admin console stopped working and one of our apps started throwing error messages on code that had not been
critical move. This would provide the following benefits:1. Legacy technology would not need to exist within the product2. Users could replace specific legacy plugins with their own versions . cfreport, for example, is so old and outdated it is not relevent to modern BI. If a user could replace
5116440 CF-4203531 Database CF 2016 - Query Caching Issue - cfstoredprocprocedure Problem Description: We’ve encountered query caching issues in our recently migrated CF 2016 environment. Our legacy system is CF 10, where the same caching procedure is working perfectly fine. See below for more
syntax request has been accepted and implemented in CF9, which is FANTASTIC ( thank you )! It’s simple and powerful and provides a singular benefit: exempting you from source code redundancy by centralizing configuration to a single line of code. We should extend the metaphor to the next two tiers
2613071 CF-3347145 External U. I am adding a vote because I have an 8 year old legacy application that stores its date/time values as their UTC equivalents -- in SQL Server 2005 which has no concept of timezone, no less; the fact that the values are UTC rather than local New Zealand Time (UTC+12
and go to mixin injection which will make required constructor args a non-issue. That said, I disagree that CFML is not required to run a constructor. The code tasked with prepping a component for operation (the constructor) is a behind the scenes concern and should run on every component instantiation
geeboh It doesn't help that every piece of CF code I've had to maintain always seems to be the worst written code I've ever encountered in my 32+ year software engineering career. The problem is, there are far too many people out there who picked up CF as a way to expand what they could do in HTML
if created in the hbm.xml files (Although direct support in CFC entities would be even better!) Property grouping is a way to achieve some exotic joins that, although uncommon, could potentially be needed from time to time, especially in cases that you’re dealing with legacy databases in with strange
2601994 CF-3037353 Legacy Area : Usability Patrick Heppler Bug 75158:(Watson Migration Closure)When using ColdFusions built-in AJAX features, you're unable to validate your site as XHTML Strict!!! It would be nice, if the ColdFusion generated JavaScript would be either placed in a separate file
= AMMATECH-TS-1_Assure_Production_PJMCommand messageId = 331A3C9A-A00F-ABAC-C68A-EE3098487A55 timestamp = 1441151210656 timeToLive = 0 body = null code = Server.Processing message = There was an unhandled failure on the server. javax/jms/InvalidSelectorException details = null
2599546 CF-3039974 Flex/Flash : Flex remoting João Fernandes Bug 79895:[JFERNANDES] LCDS integration is broken in GMC Problem: [JFERNANDES] LCDS integration is broken in GMC. Something is swalloging arguments unexpectally. The same code base running on cf8+lcds is working perfectly, upgrading
2601595 CF-3037794 Server Manager Sean Corfield Bug 75855:Tag validation error in servermanager Problem: Tag validation error in servermanager.cfc when client retrieves data sources. It seems to be about ODBC data sources - and I'm on a Mac so I don't have any ODBC services. Presumably just code
will initially log each server instance in, but at the same time will also "log all the others out". If I look at the Errors tab in the Multi server Monitor it displays the following: Fault Code: CFACCESSDENIED Fault String: Unable to invoke CFC - the current user is not authorised to invoke this method. Fault