displaying top 100 results
Portal Topic Moving from DI/1 to Wirebox in a FW/1 application
Moving from DI/1 to Wirebox in a FW/1 application
Tracker Comment Comment on String member functions break existing code that relies on java.lang.String member functions by External U.
2609881 CF-3753710 External U. This impacts my usage of FW/1 and my opinion of upgrading. Please add FW/1 to your tests.
Tracker Comment Comment on String member functions break existing code that relies on java.lang.String member functions by External U.
2609881 CF-3753710 External U. FW1 MUST work in any new version of CF!
Tracker Comment Comment on String member functions break existing code that relies on java.lang.String member functions by External U.
2609881 CF-3753710 External U. Yes, you can't break FW1.
Tracker Comment Comment on String member functions break existing code that relies on java.lang.String member functions by External U.
2609881 CF-3753710 External U. Given that this breaks FW/1, this is a pretty big problem.
Tracker Comment Comment on String member functions break existing code that relies on java.lang.String member functions by External U.
2609881 CF-3753710 External U. Our corporate installation uses FW/1 and is trying to migrate to CF11 - fixing this bug (and adding FW/1 to your test suite) will be a great help.
Tracker Comment Comment on [ANeff] Bug for: extends path is cached, even w/ all caching options off by External U.
into this issue with users using FW/1 where mappings to FW/1 were declared in the App.cfc. If people are using the same custom per app mapping (such as "fw1") then you're going to run into a potential problem with different apps potentially using an unexpected version of the framework.cfc.
2673042 CF-4155300 External U. This would be useful for applications that are not built on frameworks such as FW/1, ColdBox, and others (which provide tooling to configure things like datasource names based on environment).
Tracker Comment Comment on String member functions break existing code that relies on java.lang.String member functions by External U.
2609881 CF-3753710 External U. Breaks all our FW1 code. Also breaks anything that uses the construct shown in this bug report. Big fail!
Tracker Comment Comment on String member functions break existing code that relies on java.lang.String member functions by External U.
2609881 CF-3753710 External U. You simply cannot break FW/1. Ever. Its like a PHP update breaking WordPress.
Tracker Comment Comment on String member functions break existing code that relies on java.lang.String member functions by External U.
2609881 CF-3753710 External U. Since this breaks FW/1, this will have a huge impact on many systems out there.
Tracker Comment Comment on String member functions break existing code that relies on java.lang.String member functions by External U.
2609881 CF-3753710 External U. Breaking FW/1 is a major no-no. Let's get this issue corrected.
Tracker Comment Comment on String member functions break existing code that relies on java.lang.String member functions by External U.
2609881 CF-3753710 External U. There are so many FW/1 apps out there that this must be considered a high priority bug.
Tracker Comment Comment on String member functions break existing code that relies on java.lang.String member functions by External U.
2609881 CF-3753710 External U. Looking forward to this getting fixed. As a FW/1 user I cannot support CF11 in production until then.
Portal Topic Introduction To MVC in ColdFusion
Carl Von Stetten Introduction To MVC in ColdFusion As part of my “Introduction to MVC in ColdFusion” presentation that I’ve given at CF Summit 2016 and NCDevCon 2017, I have a sample application written three ways: In procedural style (all CFMs), As a FW/1 MVC application, and As a ColdBox MVC
2609891 CF-3750731 External U. Have you every built a ColdFusion website using FW/1, Coldbox, etc in the past, Paul? have you ever actually *used* ColdFusion *at all*?
You haven't, have you?
--
Adam
2610678 CF-3687747 External U. I use this type of functionality in FW/1 for security checks before every function in the cfc is ran as well as data scrubbing in the suggested onMethodStart and response handling / message transportation in the suggested onMethodEnd. This would allow for the main
Tracker Comment Comment on String member functions break existing code that relies on java.lang.String member functions by External U.
2609881 CF-3753710 External U. Just FYI FW/1 2.2.1 has been released with a workaround for this and the 2.5 snapshot includes it too. So folks who download the framework in future will be OK, but that doesn't help all those folks who have existing apps that use .replace() so a patch to address
Portal Topic The power of ColdFusion functions and closures
Sean Corfield The power of ColdFusion functions and closures The ColdFusion ecosystem has a number of MVC (Model-View-Controller) frameworks — with ColdBox and FW/1 (Framework One) currently being the most popular — and some of them are directly inspired by MVC frameworks in other technologies: cf
Tracker Issue Framework
2611855 CF-3581592 General Server Qais Maash Framework We see now days many ColdFusion frameworks (Model glue, FB, FW1 ....etc.) , but sadly, none of them is an official framework which support by the vendor (Adobe), what's the problem if Adobe adopt one or even come up with something new so
Tracker Comment Comment on String member functions break existing code that relies on java.lang.String member functions by External U.
string as the "second" argument, like Java's String.replace() does and like Railo's and OpenBD's replace() BIF do. Then there's no conflict and no backward compatibility.
But seriously guys, you didn't even bother to test CF11 against the FW/1 framework?
Tracker Comment Comment on cfimage writetobrowser throwing error on CF10 Mac OS X Mavericks Java 1.7 by External U.
2609838 CF-3759721 External U. To date, I have only been able to reproduce issues like this one, and the similar issue I previously commented on in this thread, while inside a FW/1 service. When I attempted to create a stand-alone repro case, I did not get any errors. Interestingly, I also did
framework. I currently use FW/1 but am planning on trying Coldbox again soon. Any existing project he touches will be in a framework so he will be picking that up as well. So spaghetti code will definitely be a no go and would advise the same to anyone else getting a new developer started.
I like your
so you've pushed the framework author into an untenable position...
And if you think this is not a real objection, take a look at the source code of the two most popular CFML frameworks: ColdBox and FW/1. Both of them currently use isCustomFunction() to test whether things are functions. DI/1 also
Tracker Issue Query scope descrepancy between tag and script
2608170 CF-4173251 Language Steve Sommers Query scope descrepancy between tag and script Problem Description: I'm fairly certain I found a scope bug. I'm using CF11 and FW/1 and I have the following query -- the tag works, the cfscript equivalent triggers a "Table named rc
Tracker Issue String member functions break existing code that relies on java.lang.String member functions
_ argument.
3. This shows you didn't even try to test this will FW/1 - one of the most popular CFML frameworks out there - because out of the box, several examples fail because they contain expressions like this (to account for the optional context root in Java web applications):
variables
guys don't actually work with either CFML applications or even modern websites. This approach only works for a single, stand-alone website (like how we might have done in 2001). What if I'm not in the business of building websites, but I build applications such as FW/1 or ColdBox or the like? Or any
Tracker Issue Bug 86494:We had severe problems with sessions after applying the Security HotFix APSB11-04
.Further details that may or may not be relevant:* We use IIS7 with URLRewriting so that framework URLs (Fusebox and FW/1) e.g. "/index.cfm?querystring" may be requested as "/directory/sub-directory/"* We use the latest secure JVM from Sun/Oracle: currently JDK1.6 Update 24* We set our session cookies (to expire
Tracker Issue sameFormFieldsAsArray setting not always respected
as if sameFormFieldsAsArray were set to true. The default (according to the documentation) is that its set to false which I do see happening if I'm not using an Application.cfc or if I dump the form scope further down the line inside a controller of an MVC application using either Fusebox or FW/1
Parse on the response.
Actual Result: See Post https://community.adobe.com/t5/coldfusion/odd-behavior-with-xmlparse-and-cf-2016/m-p/10899830?page=1#M184450
Expected Result: Converts XML text into an XML document object
Any Workarounds: We are using FW1 so the model is getting cached. If I restart Cold
4107241 CF-4201602 Martin B. As I use FW/1 ... use this to repro it. Feed any empty structure to ping_SBB() below.
---
public struct function SBB_Login ( rc ) {
var l = {};
l.h = new http ( Charset = "utf-8",
Method = "GET",
URL
MVC cfc into c:\htdocs\books\fw1\org\corfield. So that it will work right, I have defined a Mapping from "/org/corfield" to "c:\htdocs\books\fw1\org\corfield". Under CF 9 earlier, and now 9.0.1, any attempt to define this Mapping results in "java.lang.ClassCastException: java.lang.String cannot