search : cf guy

select a category, or use search below
(searches all categories and all time range)

displaying top 100 results

3133483 CF-4198786 Cameron B. Guys..... It's been ANOTHER month.
2609860 CF-3756518 Adam C. So... CF2018? You guys could do with improving yer comms around situations like this.
2608822 CF-3984812 External U. I mean JESUS CHRIST GUYS. IT'S ALMOST 2016.
2608746 CF-4012852 External U. This is hilarious. Keep going guys. Really.
2608469 CF-4087803 George M. Guys a ACF. Stop putting things under review that just site there.
2608822 CF-3984812 External U. Guys, Please help to fix this one. Is there any way out? need solution... ASAP.
2608822 CF-3984812 External U. Is there anything happening on this one? 150 Million users have upgraded to Windows 10 after July 29. CF...Guys, pl help...You need to find a way to install and development should be able to continue on Windows 10 Really disappointing...as this would have been
2682746 CFB-3734609 External U. Guess this means I won't be using CF builder any time soon. that sucks guys.
5446523 CF-4204075 Michael C. Hi Guys, The new issue is CF-4204398. Please go and add comments/votes there to see if we can finally get this issue resolved. Cheers, Mike.
5069843 CF-4203453 Manas M. @Chris @Mporter Can you guys please share sample repro files for both of your scenarios mentioned.
2962266 CF-4198446 Giancarlo G. What's going on Adobe Team? Are you guys going to look into this?
2613862 CF-3156251 Frank J. Guys, use this link to verify and let me know if the bugs is fixed: https://wikidocs.adobe.com/wiki/display/coldfusion/Installing+the+J2EE+Configuration
6259329 CF-4205250 Nick G. Guys, this is crazy. We have live client deployments that are suddenly getting errors because of this. Please fix this and give us a patch asap!
2611078 CF-3643125 External U. It just makes sense to do it right, come on guys. Coding should be intuitive.
2609221 CF-3909712 External U. That's disappointing. You guys really damaged the credibility of CFML as a viable language with your approach to CFScript-ifying functionality that was previously only available in tags, in CF11.
2610326 CF-3710381 External U. "as designed"? You guys don't get to *design* how standard operators work. The behaviour of the null-coalescing operator is well defined in other languages, and you've ballsed it up in CF. -- Adam
Charlie Arehart Thanks for the kind regards, Jake. And had you guys used the remoteipvalve to get CF to regard that header? Or was this perhaps before CF10 (and CF's Tomcat integration)?
6271442 CF-4205334 Suresh J. Charlie - we are discussing this internally (again) and will keep you guys posted . BTW - All the issues reported as of this week on update  has  been fixed , tested in some cases by customers . We shall be releasing a patch very soon , just FYI . 
6277325 CF-4205342 Jack D. Not trying to be that annoying guy, but I could really use an update on the timeline for fixing this. Project is progressing nicely, but this not being fixed will put it on hold. Please advise.
6439313 CF-4205821 Nimit S. Hello Guys, We have tried reproducing this issue at our end but unable to do so. I will really appreciate if you guys can share set of steps that we can follow to repro it at our end.  You can feel free to share more information @ [nimsharm
2608292 CF-4135460 Nimit S. I totally agree with you guys. 1) Will CF11 get the fix? This fix will be available as part of an update of ColdFusion 11. 2) Does the fix increase the limit to 10 threads? Yes, this fix increases the limit to 10 threads. -Nimit
2612615 CF-3491695 External U. So it's not a "third party limitation", it's a "lack of you guys being prepared to do the work 'limitation'". Don't blaem Quartz for you guys deciding not to implement this. It's just that you chose not to do anything about it. Which is "fine", but don't misrepresent
2603208 CF-3035879 External U. Any progress or thoughs ? It's not 1995 anymore. Our Exchange guy is unlikely to let us send the password and username of an account that can do anything to Exchange/Sharepoint across the network in clear text (i.e. 'basic'). This can't be uncommon, and is likely
2611003 CF-3653076 External U. I update to mavericks and now I cant develop in coldfusion please guys fix this asap
2613580 CF-3217374 External U. same problem for me, doesn't work, limits productivity just like the guy above said
2608822 CF-3984812 External U. Seriously. This is it. We're going to plan a migration away from ColdFusion. You guys are embarrassing us and yourselves. Windows 10 has been out for months.
2608249 CF-4154216 External U. Hi.. Thank you for taking the time to look at this bug. I have attached the files that you have requested. If you need anything else, please let me know. I can also confirm that the error also happens on CF11 and CF 2016. The guys at Hostek had a look
2610071 CF-3733001 External U. Neverfix? So Adobe dont care about making a language that does not look half-assed? Come on guys you can do better than this.
2608985 CF-3950189 External U. Please let me know if you need any more info. I am not the developer, just a network guy submitting on his behalf.
2608409 CF-4100819 External U. Hi Guys! I tried it with your code, and it had the same wrong results. When a value is selected from the drop-down list, it populates the cell with the text valuesdisplay. When another row is selected, what is displayed in the original cell converts to the value
2609244 CF-3865064 Nimit S. Hello Guys, Can you tell us which database you are using with ColdFusion? If you are using Microsoft SQL Server, then you need to prepend '@' character for every value of dbvarname attribute. For example: dbvarname="@var1"
Comment on ColdFusion 2018 Performance Monitoring Toolset Workshop @ CF Summit 2019 by Charlie Arehart
2608822 CF-3984812 External U. Fixed / Closed? I see attachments on the right, but would like at LEAST a message from Adobe here? Gotta say, Adobe...the follow up is just...lacking, guys. I wonder if the Photoshop department works this way?
6790746 CF-4207069 Piyush K. Guys, I'm closing this since I haven't been able to reproduce it in either a Command Box based CF or a standalone CF. Feel free to check out the test case I shared or if you can come up with something I can try on a standalone CF please share it here or write to me
2608822 CF-3984812 External U. Good Point Kelton, Is there anyone from Adobe evening looking in to this. W10 has already matured and plenty of PC/Laptops are getting upgraded... Where is the FIX Adobe Guys????
2609632 CF-3818547 External U. "Withdrawn" "As designed" Seriously wtf? It has been proven time and again that not only are you guys not good cfml developers, you are not good web developers period. This really sounds to me like you are afraid that if you unencrypt it then the world will see how
Comment on CF Builder : Remote servers added are not retained on the restart of CFBuilder by extuser
2613617 CF-3199313 External U. My two cheap cents: Only you guys know about the true numbers regarding CF's market share, but just from being in the business, it seems that you hear about too many companies switching to other languages (.NET and others) or avoiding CF altogether. I would hate
2609244 CF-3865064 External U. Hi Guys, It seems CF has completely ignored the issue.! I would call this as a Bug Created in Updater 11.03 by CF and asking all developer to change their code to match. We have been using the cfProcParam since the beginning of the time with CF Version 5, Even
2612133 CF-3555025 External U. "Next"? Like 12, or 13? Can you guys pls dispense with using the term "next" without qualification? You could say "12" or "next after 11", or "has missed the boat for 12, so we'll look at it for 13". Remember that "communication" is about delivering information
2608884 CF-3971083 Nimit S. Hi Guys, We have been trying to replicate this issue with our test environment and We are unable to replicate this issue. Even I tried sharing the code with Matthew which is working at my end and it is failing at his setup. It looks like there is an edge case or some
2609501 CF-3842284 External U. Also, posting files on ftp and dropbox sites DOES NOTHING when the CF admin doesn't have a login to the sites. Sometimes I hate you guys so much. We spend good money for your software and you make it so hard to actually use it. :-)
2609860 CF-3756518 External U. Best you get this reopened now, yes? And have that discussion. Whatever you plan, can you pls consult the community first because... erm... generally we've got a better idea of what to put into CF and how it should be implemented that you lot do. No disrespect meant
2609722 CF-3792283 External U. It's a regression so should be fixed. Doesn't look like you guys have appropriate unit/regression test coverage here... theer's no way this should have got past you. NB: neither rand() nor randRange() respect the randomize() seeding. -- Adam
2611837 CF-3585643 External U. Lol! Marked "NotWorthEffort". That is pretty much the label you guys can use on your whole Coldfusion product. Well, it's "NotWorthEffort" to keep paying you money for a product that has only grown more buggy. We've already been planning the migration to Railo
CF Error when checking for updates
2612255 CF-3534348 External U. A basic function and a very obvious bug exists in an expensive software package, for which you guys charge substantial upgrade fees, and you're telling me that you won't bother fixing it for the entire life of this product version? What kind of support is that?
2611187 CF-3632972 External U. Yet another CF JSON bug. This breaks on CF9 and CF10. Needless to say, Railo and OpenBD handle this fine. The JSON handling in CF is so direly flaky I really think you need to consider binning what you've done and start again. Perhaps solicit some consultancy from
6261247 CF-4205254 Nimit S. Hi Brad, We will not be fixing this issue as it is the problem with the way you guys were using it. Please let me know if you have any concern with this. -Nimit
2609682 CF-3808648 External U. This is a duplicate of https://bugbase.adobe.com/index.cfm?event=bug&id=CF-3173191, sorry. But that one is closed with excuse of "can't be arsed doing the work properly" (or "as designed" as you guys like to frame it). Don't care which ticket you fix it against
2599339 CF-3040313 Documentation : General Joseph DeVore Bug 80389:(Watson Migration Closure)What's the deal? You guys closed this and did not mark it as verified Problem: What's the deal? You guys closed this and did not mark it as verified. Do you need a screen shot to prove it or something
2608822 CF-3984812 External U. PRIORITY NEEDS TO BE SET TO URGENT. THIS IS NOT AN ENHANCEMENT BUT A COMPATIBILITY FIX. DON"T YOU GUYS TEST YOUR SHIT ON THE WORLD'S LEADING OS's PRE-RELEASES WHEN YOU CAN. BY THE WAY, CANNOT CONFIGURE THE LATEST APACHE SERVER with WSConfig either! SUCKS!!!!!! :-(
3133483 CF-4198786 Cameron B. I see a new updated posted "ColdFusion (2016 release) Update 5" and there is NO FIX FOR THIS. WTF! This is an easy thing guys... It was supposed to be in HF5 and now I get pushed to HF6. Seems like you don't care about it. Not sure what I have to do to get some actual
2611035 CF-3648781 Awdhesh K. Closure is script like syntax which would get messy and will not look good with most of the CF tags. Closure definition might look clean in Cfset, but when used as attribute value within other CF tags, the closure code may get messed up. And we believe that people
2598174 CF-3041660 External U. Given how serious this is (and I have heard of someone else being affected by it today), isn't it perhaps time that you guys *found time* to fix it? -- Adam
Comment on Bug 80389:(Watson Migration Closure)What's the deal? You guys closed this and did not mark it as verified by External U.
4357140 CF-4202547 Aaron N. Hi Nitin and Krishna, I've confirmed hf201800-4199827.jar gives the expected behavior in Public Beta Update 1 (build 2018.0.01.308605 (PreRelease)). I am more helpful if you guys give me the latest build ;) Thanks very much for providing the hotfix! Thanks!, -Aaron
2610293 CF-3712824 External U. This prevents us from being able to use the native serialization when using "this.serialization.serializeQueryAs = 'struct' " alone. Now we must write additional code. *almost* there, come on guys!
2612970 CF-3358792 External U. For update 5 I remembered to back-up my uriworkermap.properties and workers.properties files, but then ColdFusion DELETED THE ENTIRE DIRECTORY, so I lost the back-ups as well. You guys are having a laugh, you really are. Not impressed. -- Adam
2609865 CF-3755230 External U. OK the issue is based on 2 new functions in the IEventHandler. You need to now include preFlush and postFlush. Did I miss this somewhere on your noites? Did you guys even write this anywhere!!!
2609964 CF-3740481 External U. Totally agree. We have a list of thirty or so tasks, with some paused and some not. It is incredibly hard to differentiate between the two icons. Such an easy fix for you guys to include in the next update too!
the OPTION to "do it the Java way", but to unilaterally decide that's what we're doing from now on and break existing code goes completely against the way CF is supposed to work. Remember that whole "backwards compatibility is king" mantra you guys trot out when it's convenient for you? Well yeah
2613157 CF-3342688 External U. FYI, this and numerous other issues with Coldfusion are making me on a daily basis look more and more at php. I think the 8 licenses for Coldfusion 10 are likely my last... You guys should just add the documentation back in, especially because I'm sure it was not a
2962266 CF-4198446 Daniel H. James, That's the youtube video created by the guy who's blog post I referenced in the original ticket. The only solution I've found so far to solve this is to just disable HTTP/2 on Windows Server via the registry https://stackoverflow.com/questions/44660634/how
2673636 CF-4120122 External U. The security analyzer should be made available, in some form, to all ACF developers in all editions (dev, std and ent). Keeping this an enterprise only feature is a giant disservice to your community and to your customers - releasing this to all versions may actually
2610268 CF-3713706 External U. Any update on this guys? On August 25, I had a call with Piyush Kumar Nayak of the ColdFusion development team. I shared my screen and he saw first hand this problem, that ColdFusion won't start automatically on startup. I provided a lot of log files, system
2614148 CF-3129822 External U. Seriously? As this is installed an runable from the start menu, then this will need to be revised and changed on how this works. 1) 99.9% of people are going to know to got and press the start menu, go to the adobe folder and select ColdFusion 10 from the start menu
Comment on Having problems after applying a CF update? What to check, and how to recover! by Rumments
Jack_Allred2 Guys, my problem exists because I am attempting to install anew on a Windows 10, 64 bit laptop. I have a perfectly good, running CF server on my 32 bit, Windows 7 desktop. What I need is to install a 32 bit version of SQLServer there. It seems that no such animal exists for download
2609019 CF-3945845 External U. Mukesh, thanks for sharing that news that this has been addressed, and is "Fixed and verified in build#295615". But can you help us, on the outside, to know if that is referring to a coming update for CF11? or might it only be fixed in CF12 (aka "raijin")? Since
string as the "second" argument, like Java's String.replace() does and like Railo's and OpenBD's replace() BIF do. Then there's no conflict and no backward compatibility. But seriously guys, you didn't even bother to test CF11 against the FW/1 framework?
legacy project an Excel guy or whatever ran on a "server" under his desk, until the enterprise ended balkanization and now they want to migrate it to a server platform for which they have experienced developers - and nobody wants that platform to be CF because, well, for the very few people who do have
2609128 CF-3925839 Justin T. This is broken again on ColdFusion 11 Update 13. It can be seen on try.cfm as functional on every engine but ColdFusion 11. Do you guys have regression test suites for these? Here is another example: info = QueryNew("Toast","varchar",["milk"]); queryAddColumn( info
2608768 CF-4009541 External U. ATTACHED FILE HAS BEEN RENAMED from xlsm to txt for uploading. Please rename back for testing. The customer who brought me this issue first experienced it on an Edge server running CF10 The actual process inserts a bunch of data in the last sheet, which is then used
2608786 CF-3998740 External U. Yes. Contrast this with Lucee: http://lucee.org - the link is on the home page. Or OpenBD (!!): http://openbd.org - the link is on the home page. I understand Adobe not having CF on it's main home page, but the express download link should be right at the front
2609112 CF-3928680 External U. So another wiz bang feature added, that in the long run is of no real value because it is not extended to support real use cases and already outdated. You guys really need to get out of the habit of finding new features to add, dropping it in, and walking away
2609313 CF-3859758 External U. Yes, it's clear your entire way of going about this validation is ill-conceived. What sort of closure status is "too many changes". That's basically "too much work". I know you guys are work-averse, but you should be so readily admitting it. You've implemented
2602465 CF-3036827 Event Gateway PaulH Bug 73772:got a user collecting polling station data in ghana who can only afford read only SMS Problem: got a user collecting polling station data in ghana who can only afford read only SMS. the provider's only allowing receiver binding for this guy
2609884 CF-3752316 External U. Please just do what you agreed to do in: https://bugbase.adobe.com/index.cfm?event=bug&id=CF-3735413 Also see: http://cfmlblog.adamcameron.me/2014/04/survey-results-lists-in-cfml-and-naming.html Please listen to your community... we tend to have a better handle
Comment on Having problems after applying a CF update? What to check, and how to recover! by Charlie Arehart
2614255 CF-3123145 External U. Guys, it's 2014 and my team just had this exact same issue on Ubuntu Linux took us 4 hours to find it!!!! The rest of the posts are right, not fixing this is very negligent when it's such an easy change! You simply put quotes around the start commands. Can you
Portal Topic CFEXECUTE
Falconalz CFEXECUTE Hey Guys, I was wanting to know if you all ever had this issue?  I created a .NET application that will convert an RTF to a PDF but if I Launch the EXE (as an administrator)   on the server it runs as designed, however when I run it via the CF webserver using CFEXECUTE
2609313 CF-3859758 External U. Cheers for the thorough feedback, Rakshith. I'd be keen to hear in more detail why fixing this was deemed "too risky". Not in general terms, but in real world technical terms, with an indication of how you did the risk assessment. I say this because sometimes your
as a PHP guy, so why would anyone expect a PHP guy to want to swich to CF? Most developers will seek a company that does what they already like to do, instead of finding a company they want to work at and learn whatever that company uses. People tend to think along the lines of “I know how to do X, I
2614148 CF-3129822 External U. Well I just did this. Configured all the websites to the second instance, why because that is what people will accidently do. Run the tool remove the instance connector, and reinstall via the other. Now there is no way to reset the connector, it thinks
2923599 CF-4198401 Mosh T. @Poonam: I can't argue whether or not it is as-designed. You guys define the language, so it is whatever you say it is. It just seems backwards to me that everywhere else in the language, an unescaped variable resolves to the variable's value but here, in this one
2918733 CF-4198396 Bradley W. Thank you for the update. That information was definitely not clear from the ticket. I look forward to testing the changes. Also, I know you guys looked at Lucee a bit in the 2018 cycle to compare features which was great. Keep an eye on some of the Lucee bugs
2609865 CF-3755230 External U. Okay, this is what you posted in the notes. CF-3753750 - ORM application event handlers that implement the interface CFIDE.orm.IEventHandler will fail with the error "CFC xxxx does not implement the interface CFIDE.orm.IEventHandler". You have to add two new functions
2610309 CF-3712059 External U. I mean a general approach to facilitate being more aggressive about fixing bugs without you guys being able to fall back on "backwards compat". Obviously the technique is generally used to apply to the control of features-in-development, but it can be extended
2596689 CF-3842326 External U. I think you guys have it narrowed down but Adam's point is correct I think. If, in the case of the variable, it generates random IV and thus produces a different string each time - and you are saying that is the proper behavior (and I have no reason to doubt you
2609758 CF-3783361 External U. What are you guys waiting on?... Grow a pair and elevate this post to a VP or some with authority to make the pain go away. Get off the fence and make something happen! I just went thru 60 days of HELL, seeing my cold fusion site get progressively unstable every
3133483 CF-4198786 Cameron B. Alright. I'm pissed off. SERIOUSLY? It's been OVER 3 WEEKS since I've heard anything and I've contacted you TWICE since then. Why can't you guys get me a solid answer like: "Dear Mr. Bruhns, please find attached a link to a page where you can download the cfencode
2609884 CF-3752316 External U. Wait, didn't you guys just make str[i] work? So strings look like arrays? Just like so many other languages that treat strings as arrays which are collections and therefore perfect candidates for each(), map(), filter(), and reduce(). Or maybe it was Railo that very
2596808 CF-3694322 External U. For Pete's sake, Nimit. He describes the repro case in the ticket. Did you read it??! To remove all doubt: here's one: https://gist.github.com/daccfml/8497974 Both CF9 and CF10 are impacted by this. It's more simple than CFJSGeek said... the string value "yes
2673584 CF-4126377 Security Sathish Kumar Enabling Roles attribute for CFCOMPONENT Duplicate ID: CF-4126370 Hi Guys, The roles attribute for coldfusion functions is good at security application functionalities from unauthorised users. It would be great if we can possibly extend this feature
2673587 CF-4126372 Security Sathish Kumar Enabling Roles attribute for CFCOMPONENT Duplicate ID: CF-4126370 Hi Guys, The roles attribute for coldfusion functions is good at security application functionalities from unauthorised users. It would be great if we can possibly extend this feature
2611501 CF-3616682 External U. Hi Rupesh, thanks for finally coming back to us. Seriously: almost two years to do so? What's with that? "Also, since this attribute has been there for such a long time, I don;t see any compelling need to change it." Because *it would be an improvement*. Your "logic