search : adam m.

select a category, or use search below
(searches all categories and all time range)

displaying top 100 results

Comment on Function SerializeJSON() converts employee's last name ("No") to boolean false in JSON output by Adam M.
2556976 CF-4197194 Adam C. Suchika: you don't understand what you're talking about, I'm afraid. All the references to `counter` are *the same variable*. That's how closure works. Check other languages as a reference. Here's the equiv in PHP: http://sandbox.onlinephpfunctions.com/code/2defddd623f
2597794 CF-3042593 Adam C. Why is this the design though, Sandeep? And it's a bit presumptuous of you to simply say "it's as designed" and then close it. What if the consensus is the design was wrong? I'm not saying it is wrong, but this is not the way to conduct a discussion on an issue.
2608653 CF-4033628 External U. Hi Pavan, Thank you very much for considering. Hi Adam, I'm looking forward to Aether fixing stuff by busting backward-compat like none other :) Thanks!, -Aaron
2608886 CF-3971067 External U. Thanks for explaining that Adam. I'm not that familiar with the underlying Java plumbing, so I appreciate the insights.
2609687 CF-3804384 External U. Adam Cameron sent me I'm in charlston sc for a hackathon this weekend
2599494 CF-3040133 External U. +1 vote. I'm not sure about the implementation, but the concept is OK. -- Adam
2611035 CF-3648781 External U. Wow, yeah, I'm with Adam. I checked this ticket when he commented yesterday and it was not marked "ToFix" then. I'm glad you're going to fix this issue but don't play us. At least have the decency to admit you've changed your mind.
2609860 CF-3756518 External U. (oops, PS: I'm sure I've raised this before, but could not find the ticket) -- Adam
2612796 CF-3429588 External U. I agree with the venn diagram on Adam's blog. I'm also not sure I see the purpose in a separate isCustomFunction() and isClosure() function. A function is a function to me regardless of how it was declared.
2609471 CF-3844976 External U. There is another ticket for this already raised by Adam C that was closed without explanation, so I'm entering a new one.
2609656 CF-3814079 Language Adam Cameron datasource attribute on should no longer be required It should use the application-wide DSN if it's set. Same should apply to all DB-using functionality. This issue probably predates CF11, but that's the version I'm working with. -- Adam
it as a bug as it seems like a poor design decision in the first place, whether you intended to do it or no. -- Adam PS: I'm sure I have raised this before, but cannot find the ticket. ----------------------------- Additional Watson Details ----------------------------- Watson Bug ID: 3756524
2609630 CF-3818587 External U. Interesting. if one does this instead; arrayFind(x, i&"") then it "works" (I'm not advocating that as a work around, just an observation) -- Adam
2609893 CF-3750729 External U. @Adam, cool. I can see locking down Dev to match Production. Maybe I'm too lazy to bother. ;-)
2673322 CF-4126739 Language Adam Cameron Probable bug: sorted struct callback arguments I’m just after clarification of this code: sorted = structNew("sorted", function(key1,key2){ writeDump(arguments); abort; }); sorted.first = 2; Note I’m aborting in the callback loop. I’d expect key1
2556973 CF-3825042 Piyush K. Adam T, I'm re-orienting this bug's area from document/spreadsheet to "debugging" for reasons noted in my previous comment. In case you are experiencing an issue with a spreadsheet related tag, please revert with the relevant code extract. Adam C, we can raise a
2610200 CF-3720137 External U. Precisely. Hence "in this case it should raise an exception." I'm not suggesting making CF case-sensitive, I'm suggesting that you don't silently lose data. -- Adam
2613457 CF-3312096 External U. I can confirm what James says here. The bug ain't fixed in CF10. I'm running 10,0,11,285437, so should include the fix, based on your claim "Fixed In Build 283521" -- Adam
2608343 CF-4118297 External U. Hi Adam, But the System Info page says "Version: 2016.0.0.297996". I'm not seeing 12 anywhere.. Interestingly, CFB's Product Details says "Version: 3.1.0". So.. I'm confused now. I thought they said they'd changed the name AND version to 2016 for both products
2613427 CF-3318104 External U. I'm not having this problem (I don't run Win2k8), but I've heard enough of it happening that it seriously needs looking at. -- Adam
2609771 CF-3777403 External U. I'm seeing this too. It's a parser bug by the looks of it, as this variation works fine: #time#: #TimeFormat(time, "hh:mm:ss")# (#dateadd("s", 0, time)#) -- Adam
2614275 CF-3121288 Aaron N. Hi Adam, I just realized Rupesh never replied. And, I'm guessing he never will (since he's now on another Adobe team). So, I've filed CF-4199432, to document which per-app settings are read on each request. Thanks!, -Aaron
2609174 CF-3916028 External U. Hi Adam, I just saw your comment. Thanks, and yes, I agree I should've filed this as a bug. I'm glad to see it's now been set ToFix/BugVerified. I'm currently waiting for a handful of S3 bugs to be fixed. Thanks!, -Aaron
2613236 CF-3337574 External U. +1, I'd previously filed #CF-3130900 w/ input from Adam. It was for a m liking the Application.cfc-level THIS.accessorScope &
2598073 CF-3041771 External U. How did Gaurav think we were going to guess that was what was going on here? And how is it that he didn't bother to post back on the ticket "hey, I can't replicate this, so maybe I'm missing something: Charlie can you please elaborate?" -- Adam
of arbitrary code, I'd be all for it. I'd also be all for "success" handlers on a (which would solve this sort of issue). But I'm not behind the feature request as described here at all. -- Adam
2673631 CF-4120177 Aaron N. Hi Adobe, Can you please reply to Adam's comment on 11/22/2016 22:19:58 GMT? I, too, would like to know what the closure will receive. Thanks!, -Aaron P.S. Currently, my name isn't listed under my vote comment (where I'm thanking Vamsee for filing this for me
2609048 CF-3941602 Aaron N. I'm also glad to see this fixed :) But, yeah, agreeing w/ Adam: This ticket isn't completely fixed until the docs are updated. And, of course, "going dark" helps ensure tickets aren't properly hashed-out before being implemented (leading to future tickets, backward
2673645 CF-4119993 Documentation Adam Cameron The docs for querysort are useless https://helpx.adobe.com/coldfusion/cfml-reference/coldfusion-functions/functions-m-r/querysort.html There's no example, there's no definition of what the callback function signature is. They are just completely
2610294 CF-3712823 External U. Adam, looking at your entry, I may have misread it,and if so, I'm sorry. It sounds like you want to add a new set of data, columntypes, so that the client code can know what it was, is that so? I have a comment on that but want to confirm first. And again - I
2597302 CF-3044009 External U. Thanks Rupesh: that makes it far more clear, and gives people a chance to help you progress this issue. I personally don't have further info, but I'm sure other people will (now that they know you're looking for help!) -- Adam
2597062 CF-3134331 Language Adam Cameron CF too liberal in what it will cast to a date See this thread on the Adobe forums: http://forums.adobe.com/message/4219877#4219877 Summary: All of this can be somewhat simplified to this: EQUALS NOT EQUALS And the answer
2609722 CF-3792283 External U. For reference, the original example with the bug before Adam updated the docs can be found on http://help.adobe.com/livedocs/coldfusion/8/htmldocs/help.html?content=functions_m-r_23.html . This example in these older docs still has the bug when run under CF10.
2610680 CF-3687548 External U. Fair enough. Make sure to involve the broader community in the discussions though, eh? Not just the "special" people in the CAB / PR Programme. I think there are more well-informed opinions outside those groups than inside, if I'm to be blunt about it (and I don
2608739 CF-4013832 General Server Adam Cameron CLI/REPL - probably via CommandBox I'm sure this has been raised before, but I cannot find the ticket. ColdFusion needs a CLI/REPL for it to be taken seriously in these times. It's just a fundamental. CommandBox is really good in this regard, so
2608427 CF-4096966 External U. Hi Adam, Does WordUtils have an ignore list concept? I'm not seeing on here: https://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-lang/javadocs/api-2.6/org/apache/commons/lang/WordUtils.html I like the idea of ignoreList being more global, instead of as a parameter. And I like
2609884 CF-3752316 External U. listMap(), listEach(), listFilter() etc also have not been fixed. I'm not gonna bother reporting other ones missing, but pls make sure to do a thorough job this time round ;-) -- Adam
2609626 CF-3818776 External U. Hi Rupesh, Thanks very much for confirming all of that! Very cool about #1 and especially #3 =) And I think this is the 1st time I've received an email notification of an engineer adding a comment, so -maybe- that notification issue has been fixed. And I'm also w
2611902 CF-3576114 Language Adam Cameron Make the way scopeless variables are handled configurable... I'm lifting this idea from Railo: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/RAILO-2142 Basically the way function-local variables are handled in ColdFusion bites, and always has. An unscoped variable in a
: And the CFScript implemented is a fairly leaden transliteration of that: savecontent variable="content" { // stuff goes here } I'm sorry, but this: variable="content" is just rubbish. The construct ought to be: content = savecontent { // stuff goes here } That would make more sense, yes? -- Adam
2610287 CF-3713043 Language Adam Cameron listMap() doesn't pass correct args to callback See: http://cfmlblog.adamcameron.me/2014/02/coldfusion-11-map-and-reduce.html {quote} listMap() takes some other arguments I'm not using here: the list delimiter and a flag as to whether to respect empty list
2612864 CF-3377581 External U. Akhila, I have no reason to doubt you, but could you please point me to the spec wherein it says empty namespaces are illegal? I'm guessing you have it there in front of you, and it'd just save me time trying to find it to verify what you say. Cheers. -- Adam
on that one. Whilst I'm here, how about getting rid of the "cf" on "cfsqltype". Indeed, just get rid of "cfsql". It's a type. It's in a tag... we know it's CF and SQL, so why belabour the point? Cheer. -- Adam ----------------------------- Additional Watson Details ----------------------------- Watson
2600180 CF-3039303 External U. +1 vote. I'm for parameterisation to be done automatically (rather than via an additional attribute). Otherwise people might not use it. And existing code won't be protected unless it's updated. -- Adam
2608653 CF-4033628 External U. Hi Adam, Hopefully I understand.. Would having a "Cache" object, w/ methods, be another example of what you're suggesting? Example: Cache.Get() Cache.Put() Cache.Remove() instead of cacheGet(), cachePut(), cacheRemove(), etc Or maybe I'm way off? Thanks!, -Aaron
2602047 CF-3037289 External U. +1 vote. I can see this being useful. I'm not too sure you've quite nailed the syntax for the path, but I cannot think of a better approach off the top of my head (which is where I apparently keep my inspiration). Cheers. -- Adam
2610330 CF-3710326 External U. Denard, they have to have a valid and reasonable use case before implementing any functionality. The "harm" here is I'm not sure Adobe know what they're doing, which means they need to spend more time thinking things through (and if necessary consulting with people
2613427 CF-3318104 External U. I, like Adam and Miguel, am not personally having this issue (yet) because I am still in the process of configuring our new CF10 server (Win2K8 R2) and don't have any users hitting it in production yet, But I'm very concerned that I may encounter the same issues.
2609471 CF-3844976 External U. I'm dead keen to know about the potential editing of Brad's ticket detail too, TBH. I've had the impression some of my tickets have been surreptitiously edited in the past, but could never "prove" it. This bug trackers needs a "view history" option. -- Adam
i in arrayNew(object.getArray()) )That should be a really simple fix and makes working with native java arrays easier too.(I'm raising this on behalf of Elliott Sprehn)-- Adam Method: Result: ----------------------------- Additional Watson Details ----------------------------- Watson Bug ID
2611855 CF-3581592 External U. I'm definitely behind this. ColdFusion could use something like RoR baked in. RoR made Ruby the popular language it is today, so hopefully CF could do the same thing, It would have to be a very solid piece of work though, not something half-arsed. -- Adam
2597967 CF-3041887 Language : Tags Adam Cameron Bug 83821:(Watson Migration Closure)Summary: Add CFC types to TYPE attribute of CFPARAMIt would be handy to be able to validate a variable as being of a given CFC type in a tag, eg: tag, eg:IE: for it to work the same as a or a tag.I'm surprised
to identify these failures, I'm guessing they don't stop the server starting... because that's make them pretty easy to identify ;-) -- Adam
2611943 CF-3572225 External U. I'm seeing this too on CF9.0.1. Note that if I pass the query by value rather than reference, there is no problem (to state the somewhat obvious). That said, CF should not be messing with the data unless it's solicited to do so, which it is not, in this case. +1
2612221 CF-3539041 Logging Adam Cameron coldfusion-out logs stuff targeted for other logs An out log shoudl log stuff that's sent to stdout (or equivalent thereof). What I'm seeing is everything that's targeted at another log (eg: via writeLog(file="foo" //etc) is ALSO going into coldfusion
2612836 CF-3389023 External U. Hi, Adam, You'd think so. But, no, the people who make decisions aren't that involved that they remember or even documented what is supposed to be indexed. And the developer who originally worked on this is no longer here, and cannot be contacted. So, unless
By:hkallae Note Added: Because, CGI scope is not supported in CLI. Documentation is updated with the scopes that are supported. Date Added :2015-07-22 02:27:12.0 Added By: PreRelease User User Name:Adam Cameron Note Added: I'm sorry, how is this not a bug? Date Added :2015-07-21 20:12:44.0 Added By
of an interface, and the implementation thereof.I'm more than happy to be corrected on this, though.-- Adam Method: Result: ----------------------------- Additional Watson Details ----------------------------- Watson Bug ID: 3041802 Deployment Phase: Release Candidate External Customer Info: External
2609882 CF-3752424 External U. Sorry Andrew; I'm with Sean on this one. (and, to be very clear, just like Sean and Ray, I completely understand what you're saying. I just don't agree with what you're suggesting). There is nothing to fix here, and if it was positioned as an enhancement request, I
function that accepts all of y,m,d,h,m,s,l and creates an appropriate number too (createDateTimeSpan()? Dunno). It would perhaps better work taking a single struct of params, so one can pass {y=1,s=1} rather than 1,0,0,0,0,1 -- Adam
2673464 CF-4126522 Language Adam Cameron We don't need both ordered and sorted structs I'm left to wonder is is there any real point in having both ordered and sorted structs? ordering and sorting in this context is pretty much the same thing, and really insertion-order, alphabetical
2616153 CF-3035293 Rupesh K. [Adam Cameron] : This security patch has been applied to (/writeDump)! Not simply "don’t allow nameless applications" at all when the switch is on. I’m sorry, but that’s really an example of unthinking "how not to solve a problem". Only the direct dump
. This function deals with HTTP, it's nothing specific to REST." You seem to be missing the point I'm trying to make: this function *could* be used - and ben quite useful for - for non-REST responses too. So why make the artificial limitation? -- Adam
of concept, but it's not really production-ready. And it's been like this since forever. It's about time QoQ got a second tranche of development. NB: I'm sure I've raised this (or variation thereupon) before, but I cannot find the ticket. -- Adam ----------------------------- Additional Watson Details
demonstrate some effort in understanding the issue, rather than fall back to us doing your work for you? (that said, let me dish out the code... in the mean time, pls post how you'd been trying to repro it, I'm fascinated to see how you *couldn't* repro this). -- Adam
it not actually do what it's supposed to. You can't have a tag that *sometimes* includes, compiles, executes a file; and sometimes doesn't. That's really shit language design. I really don't think this functionality has been thought through and designed to the point it should be part of the product (and I'm
2598594 CF-3041157 General Server Adam Cameron Bug 82443:(Watson Migration Closure)Summary: improve error message referencing CFAPPLICATION tagSee the attached error Problem: Summary: improve error message referencing CFAPPLICATION tagSee the attached error. Given I'm using CF9, talking about
". Documented here: http://ruby-doc.org/docs/keywords/1.9/files/keywords_rb.html#M000031Basically it causes code execution to return to the beginning of the TRY block, and try again. This could be quite handy in CF, perhaps?-- Adam Method: Result
2600041 CF-3039448 Language : Tags Adam Cameron Bug 79089:(Watson Migration Closure)Summary: no option for CFTOOLTIP text to NOT dismissI have a which I do not want to be dismissed until the user moves the mouse away Problem: Summary: no option for CFTOOLTIP text to NOT dismissI have a which I
. Please implement.I'm raising this as a BUG because the idea in CF9 was to port all of CF's tag-only functionality to be script-able, which clearly has not been achieved with omissions like this.-- Adam Method: Result: ----------------------------- Additional Watson Details
for to be usable from CFScript. Please implement.I'm raising this as a BUG because the idea in CF9 was to port all of CF's tag-only functionality to be script-able, which clearly has not been achieved with omissions like this.-- Adam Method: Result: ----------------------------- Additional Watson Details
for to be usable from CFScript. Please implement.I'm raising this as a BUG because the idea in CF9 was to port all of CF's tag-only functionality to be script-able, which clearly has not been achieved with omissions like this.-- Adam Method: Result: ----------------------------- Additional Watson Details
for to be usable from CFScript. Please implement.I'm raising this as a BUG because the idea in CF9 was to port all of CF's tag-only functionality to be script-able, which clearly has not been achieved with omissions like this.-- Adam Method: Result: ----------------------------- Additional Watson Details
for to be usable from CFScript. Please implement.I'm raising this as a BUG because the idea in CF9 was to port all of CF's tag-only functionality to be script-able, which clearly ahs not been achieved with omissions like this.-- Adam Method: Result: ----------------------------- Additional Watson Details
for to be usable form CFScript. PLease implement.I'm raising this as a BUG because the idea in CF9 was to port all of CF's tag-only functionality to be script-able, which clearly ahs not been achieved with omissions like this.-- Adam Method: Result: ----------------------------- Additional Watson Details
for to be usable form CFScript. PLease implement.I'm raising this as a BUG because the idea in CF9 was to port all of CF's tag-only functionality to be script-able, which clearly ahs not been achieved with omissions like this.-- Adam Method: Result: ----------------------------- Additional Watson Details
rendered. "text" kind of suggests to me that only plain-text is supported. I'm only marking this as "important" because it's important to sort it before v1.0 of this goes out the door. It would be bad to release it then change it later. Cheers. -- Adam Method: Result
CFScript supportI've had a non-theoretical need for / / to be usable from CFScript. Please implement.I'm raising this as a BUG because the idea in CF9 was to port all of CF's tag-only functionality to be script-able, which clearly ahs not been achieved with omissions like this.-- Adam Method: Result
2609053 CF-3941059 External U. @Adam, I went back an forth the update 17 and 18, so that I could create the case. Strangely enough the last time I went to 18 it seems to work better. It appears to me that the problem is just the sheer size of the data I'm serializing and having concurrent
2608701 CF-4020668 External U. Hi Adam, Callback feature is now in the following docs: https://helpx.adobe.com/coldfusion/cfml-reference/coldfusion-functions/functions-l/listsort.html https://helpx.adobe.com/coldfusion/cfml-reference/coldfusion-functions/functions-s/structsort.html Query
2610239 CF-3715376 External U. Hi Adam, Callback feature is now in the following docs: https://helpx.adobe.com/coldfusion/cfml-reference/coldfusion-functions/functions-l/listsort.html https://helpx.adobe.com/coldfusion/cfml-reference/coldfusion-functions/functions-s/structsort.html Query
2596882 CF-3511975 External U. Re: Adam.Tuttle, as noted on prior notes, it is not actually about cfscript length, but I'm not allowed to edit the title. Watch the video, it's very blatantly a compiler problem that is brand new in CHF3. This code has been around since CF8 with absolutely zero
2610290 CF-3713035 Language Adam Cameron arrayEach() (and listEach()) slightly broken in CF11 See http://cfmlblog.adamcameron.me/2014/02/coldfusion-11-map-and-reduce.html In CF10 one did not NEED to specify the arguments in the callback definition for arrayEach(), this would be fine: {code
2673375 CF-4126680 Security Analyzer Adam Cameron Security scanner SQLi odd guidance INSERT INTO someTable ( uuid )VALUES( ’#createUuid()#’ ) SELECT ’#createUuid()#’ AS uuid FROM someTable The first INSERT just gets a warning; the first SELECT gets an error (if anything... should
2609368 CF-3853251 Language Adam Cameron Array methods: shift(), unshift(), push(), pop() (see https://issues.jboss.org/browse/RAILO-3252) Performing queue / stack operations on arrays is fairly common, and whilst doable with delete() / insert() methods, is not as elegant as these specific methods
2608792 CF-3993718 External U. Hi Adam and Suchika, You're right! I've confirmed the same w/ THIS.datasource and THIS.timeout and added the following note to https://wikidocs.adobe.com/wiki/display/coldfusionen/Defining+the+application+and+its+event+handlers+in+Application.cfc: "These application
2597031 CF-3183072 Language Adam Cameron xmlParse() does not correctly identify UTF-8 files I have a UTF-8-encoded file, which xmlParse() appears to read as ISO-8859-1 or whatever it is CF ass-u-me`s all files to be unless otherwise told. The result being any non-ASCII "extended" unicode
2613127 CF-3345191 External U. What's the fix here? Allowing underscores, or making the thing work according to the spec? I'm presuming (can't be bothered checking) that Jamo is correct in that underscores are allowed in subdomains, but not TLDs? And at the very least do isValid() and agree now
2598141 CF-3041694 Language : Functions Adam Cameron Bug 83421:(Watson Migration Closure)Summary: Lack of uniformity in support for date parts Problem: Summary: Lack of uniformity in support for date parts dateCompare() supports these (this is all according to the docs, anyhow): s : Precise
2682655 CFB-3784112 Installer Adam Cameron. Updater files are unsigned I'm just trying to install the update that is suggested immediately after doing a fresh install of CFB. Along the way I get a prompt: Warning: You are installing software that contains unsigned content. The authenticity
to cover in-place features too. Currently you just have a new randomly managed setting (neo-runtime.xml, CFAdmin, Application.cfc, attribute on the tag or argument on the function) when you do stuff like this. I'm suggesting taking a coherent uniform approach. http
2673659 CF-4119107 Documentation Adam Cameron Docs for query iteration methods missing sections EG: https://helpx.adobe.com/coldfusion/cfml-reference/coldfusion-functions/functions-m-r/queryfilter.html (and same applies to map, each, sort, reduce) These pages are missing the category, history
't expect any of that would matter. Code I'm using is here: https://gist.github.com/adamcameron/2f03a09008ef9dffa8cd HTH, and do report back, eh? -- Adam
2610289 CF-3713038 Language Adam Cameron listMap() doesn't work See: http://cfmlblog.adamcameron.me/2014/02/coldfusion-11-map-and-reduce.html {quote} This function doesn't work, I'm afraid (or I'm doing something wrong which I cannot identify). We're not off to a good start here. Here's some
2599688 CF-3039826 Document Management : PDF generation Adam Cameron Bug 79644:(Watson Migration Closure)Summary: CFDOCUMENT struggles to kern bold text in a sans-serif fontI'm raising this on behalf of cwmcguire on the Adobe support forums Problem: Summary: CFDOCUMENT struggles to kern bold text
2609213 CF-3910531 Installation/Config : Hotfix Installer Adam Cameron Update deinstaller restarts wrong version of CF I have both CF11 Express and full installed on the same (dev) machine. In different directories. They use the same HTTP port though, although this should not be relevant. When I